From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Soapy Smith <soapy-smith@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Clojure Code Block Results not Tabularized
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:06:20 -0500
Message-ID: <1391000780.2272.18.camel@raven-CM5571>
References: <CAAJj91efbkKP1fdmL0mWNOHZuZiwHkmwTm1KXF2FnxnFNa3bvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<1390915384.2241.11.camel@raven-CM5571> <m2y51zkynz.fsf@uio.no>
	<1390998988.2272.12.camel@raven-CM5571> <m2wqhjkkrp.fsf@uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39841)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1W8Ur1-0002ri-8O
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:07:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1W8Uqs-0006HW-OP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:06:55 -0500
Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.24]:39116)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <soapy-smith@comcast.net>) id 1W8Uqs-0006H5-K1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:06:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m2wqhjkkrp.fsf@uio.no>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Yes, I agree the Clojure behavior is not quite correct.  But all the
functionality is there if both the old and new are combined.  I think
only a rearrangement of existing code is required.

I like the idea of comparing to the behavior of Python code blocks.
I've got a Coursera class coming up which will use Python, so I need to
get it set it up here.

Thank you for the assistance!
Greg

On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 13:58 +0100, Christian Moe wrote:
> Soapy Smith writes:
> 
> > Christian, could you try :results table with Python and reply back with
> > the #+RESULTS:?
> 
> Same as the default, i.e. a table, as expected.
> #+RESULTS:
> | 1 | 2 | 3 |
> 
> The Babel/Clojure behavior you report does seem buggy. 
> 
> I'm afraid I can't be of further help, but hopefully others will pick up
> on this.
> 
> Yours,
> Christian