From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: example/src blocks and latex export
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:03:44 -0400
Message-ID: <12981.1313791424@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
References: <6977.1313748571@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org>
	<874o1d6qi4.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38701)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1QuXAN-0003R7-7E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:03:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1QuXAK-0005ln-HS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:03:51 -0400
Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:32748)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nick@dokosmarshall.org>) id 1QuXAK-0005la-CR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:03:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
	of "Fri, 19 Aug 2011 23:27:47 +0200." <874o1d6qi4.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> wrote:

> Hi Nick,
> 
> Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com> writes:
> 
> > * foo
> >
> > Verbiage to begin the paragraph
> > #+begin_src shell
> > get-config.py var section [section ...]
> > #+end_src
> > and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
> >
> > * bar
> >
> > Verbiage to begin the paragraph
> > #+begin_example
> > get-config.py var section [section ...]
> > #+end_example
> > and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
> 
> I tested your patch with the example above and I get this:
> 
> ,----
> | Verbiage to begin the paragraph
> | 
> | \lstset{language=shell}
> | \begin{lstlisting}
> | get-config.py var section [section ...]
> | \end{lstlisting}
> | 
> | and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
> | \section*{bar}
> | \label{sec-2}
> | 
> | 
> | Verbiage to begin the paragraph
> | 
> | \begin{verbatim}
> | get-config.py var section [section ...]
> | \end{verbatim}
> | and verbiage to end the same paragraph.
> `----
> 
> It looks better than the current export (less white lines) but still
> has a problem with the first "and verbiage..." being indented.
> 
> Is this intentional?  Or do you want the same behavior for #+begin_src
> and #+begin_example?
> 

Not intentional. But I have org-export-latex-listings set to nil, so in
my case, the src block gets turned into a verbatim environment, not into
a listings environment, and there is no empty line there.  Let me play
around a bit with org-export-latex-listings and see.

I guess the change in org-latex-verbatim-wrap takes care of my case,
but there is another (gratuitous?) newline inserted after listings.

> In overall, I think number of white lines should be the same in the
> Org source file and in the LaTeX exported file, so a patch here is
> welcome.  But maybe I misunderstood something in Eric's reply.

I tend to agree, but I can also understand Eric's wish for visual
separation.  However, as I pointed out in my earlier reply to him, I
think that's a separate problem, not addressed (or affected) by this
patch.

Thanks for testing,
Nick