From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: BUG: org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr without requiring cl Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:23:53 -0500 Message-ID: <12966.1257780233@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: <20091109130727.GG29752@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7W7U-0006sN-JA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:25:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7W7P-0006pR-Qx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:25:27 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45640 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7W7O-0006pE-TP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:25:22 -0500 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:33157) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7W7N-0007KC-5H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:25:21 -0500 Received: from gamaville.dokosmarshall.org ([173.76.32.106]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KSU0059TLETXRK1@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 09:23:30 -0600 (CST) In-reply-to: Message from Adam Spiers of "Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:07:27 GMT." <20091109130727.GG29752@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list Adam Spiers wrote: > org-annotation-helper.el uses caddr but does not require the cl > package; this results in > > *ERROR*: Symbol's function definition is void: caddr > > when bzg/org-annotate-helper is invoked. > > Isn't org-annotation-helper.el obsolete? I thought org-protocol.el has supplanted it completely, in which case it might be better to just delete it from the tree, instead of fixing it (or perhaps move it to a deprecated area) - that would also help in not confusing new users. Thanks, Nick