From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Co-maintainer, a least for some time?
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 17:26:36 -0400
Message-ID: <116DF537-EA03-4353-8FE8-3AE51ABB3E31@gmail.com>
References: <A869ECDE-8131-40F3-95FD-18CBF1F48828@gmail.com>
	<87hbm2d54x.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44543 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFDGQ-0006iQ-De
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:26:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1OFDGO-0006bo-O3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:26:46 -0400
Received: from mail-pz0-f176.google.com ([209.85.222.176]:49288)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jwiegley@gmail.com>) id 1OFDGM-0006bX-HR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 17:26:44 -0400
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so126847pzk.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 20 May 2010 14:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87hbm2d54x.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: David Maus <dmaus@ictsoc.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

On May 20, 2010, at 10:22 AM, David Maus wrote:

> Both systems would form a queue of things to be done: The organizing
> task consists of (a) reviewing non-patch-issues and (b) reviewing open
> patch-issues in patchwork and (c) make decisions (e.g. apply patch,
> comment, etc.).
>=20
> This is something I volunteer to do.

I currently use Org-mode to track issues in another open source project, =
Ledger.  It has worked quite well for me, but then I haven't had to =
share the contents of this file with other people yet.

I also have a Bugzilla running on the same server that now hosts =
Patchwork.  If you discover that such an issue tracker would be easier =
to manage for you, I'd be happy to setup an Org-mode product within it.

John=