From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>
Subject: Re: I'm tripping over #+BABEL: vs. #+PROPERTY:
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:21:07 -0400
Message-ID: <11652.1331760067@alphaville>
References: <21A5E1E970CD46459ECBE86D6CC4B28C5364FAE0@spexch01.WindLogics.local>
	<87ipi72g0q.fsf@gmx.com>
Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44163)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1S7vdB-0001YY-AR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:21:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1S7vd9-0000wt-Gb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:21:12 -0400
Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.18]:41274)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nicholas.dokos@hp.com>) id 1S7vd9-0000wn-CG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:21:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: Message from Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
	of "Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:28:53 EDT." <87ipi72g0q.fsf@gmx.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, Ken Williams <Ken.Williams@windlogics.com>

Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com> wrote:

> 
> Did you press C-c C-c on each property line after it was written?

Just to clarify: do I really have to C-c C-c on each line? If I add a
bunch of them and then do C-c C-c on one of them, shouldn't that be
enough to refresh the setup?

Thanks,
Nick