From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: LaTeX export: inline markup underscore problem Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:00 -0400 Message-ID: <1112.1302466080@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> References: Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42637 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q90w4-0000gL-Oq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q90w3-0005GN-G7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:40 -0400 Received: from vms173003pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.3]:45329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q90w3-0005D3-CJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 16:08:39 -0400 Received: from alphaville.dokosmarshall.org ([unknown] [173.76.32.106]) by vms173003.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LJG009M9D9DEKK0@vms173003.mailsrvcs.net> for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Apr 2011 15:08:13 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: Message from "Thomas S. Dye" of "Sun, 10 Apr 2011 09:36:35 -1000." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Thomas S. Dye" Cc: Mauro Rovezzi , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, nicholas.dokos@hp.com Thomas S. Dye wrote: > Aloha Mauro, > > Please see > > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-latex-export.html#sec-17_2 > Excuse the intrusion, but I don't see anything in there that looks like a solution to the OP's problem (the undesired quoting of the underscore when exporting the org file to LaTeX): what am I missing? I was going to suggest that life would be much easier for the OP if he could change all underscores to some other character in his bibliography (I often see colons and minus signs used e.g.) That may or may not be possible of course, but if it is possible, it would be the simplest solution: the treatment of _ in the LaTeX exporter is often the source of frustration. That is not the fault of the exporter of course: TeX makes it very complicated to determine what the right thing to do is. Nick