Re: [wip-cite-new] Initial implementation of `biblatex' citation processor

[Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org>]

Am 18.05.2021 um 17:13 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> Hello,
> 
> In a rebased "wip-cite-new" branch, I made an modest attempt to write
> a `biblatex' citation processor, in the file "oc-biblatex.el
As Bruces has already written, this doesn't look modest at all.

[...]

> 
> - author(a), including caps(c), full(f) and caps-full(f) variants,
> - locators(l), including bare(b), caps(c) bare-caps(bc) variants,
> - nocite(n),
> - note(fn), including bare(b) variant,
> - smart(sm), including caps(c) variant,
> - super(s),
> - text(t), including caps(c) variant,
> - title(ti), including full(f) variant,
> - year(y), including full(f) variant,
> - default style, including caps(c) variant.

Is there a way to get a simple \cite?
Also, footcite should be there.

> 
> The default style creates "autocite" commands.
> 
[...]
> 
> I don't use biblatex, but I'm not convinced by the default autocite
> command. Wouldn't parencite be more predictable? Also, adding
> 
>    #+cite_export biblatex ... auto
> 
> to trigger autocite by default seems easy enough. 
I think autocite is a reasonable default. Parencite would be a bad fit 
for the verbose styles. And in author-year styles autocite is equivalent 
to parencite anyway.

Denis