Re: Feature-request & documentation request for org-datetree

[Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been poking about trying to understand org-date tree, as It is
> essentially an undocumented feature at the moment. am i right in my
> understanding that it is only meant as a refile-target structure?
>
> The feature request is to allow the use of ISO week numbers to
> structure the year rather than Months.
>
> so a structure something like:
> * 2010
> *** 2010-W35
> ***** 2010-08-30 Monday
> ***** 2010-08-31 Tuesday
> ***** 2010-09-01 Wednesday
> ***** 2010-09-02 Thursday
> ***** 2010-08-03 Friday
> ***** 2010-08-04 Saturday
> ***** 2010-08-05 Sunday
>
> The week heading is based on the ISO representation,
> (http://www.iso.org/iso/date_and_time_format) though i guess some
> variant on the ISO week heading might look  be better.

I have personally no love for ISO weeks, but I would accept a patch
which implements a second date tree structure that looks like this

Maybe the capture target could be called file_datetree-isoweek
or something like this...

- Carsten



>
> what other use can it be used for? how are other people using it?
>
> regards,
>
> Tim.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

- Carsten