From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tom Breton (Tehom)" Subject: Re: Org-choose Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:34:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1036.24.63.20.74.1234553649.squirrel@mail.panix.com> References: <273688C0-9A36-47D5-B747-A1371C2BD05A@uva.nl> <1782.65.96.63.84.1234471662.squirrel@mail.panix.com> <5E0C3EFF-06FA-4446-B869-F514B6748C5E@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LY3ng-0004V1-W0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:34:13 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LY3ne-0004Un-V8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:34:11 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50743 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LY3ne-0004Uj-3V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:34:10 -0500 Received: from mail1.panix.com ([166.84.1.72]:62525) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LY3nd-0004Qj-Rl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:34:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5E0C3EFF-06FA-4446-B869-F514B6748C5E@uva.nl> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Carsten. > One more thought: I did read in another message that you > are using an older version of Emacs? Emacs 21? > > I have a vague memory that split-string might work different > there, with empty fields at the beginning and end.... > > I am not at all sure, though. It it has to to, maybe > you want to use org-split-string.... That just might be it! I have changed it to org-split-string. A patch is attached. I can't detect any difference - all tests pass either way - so I hope you will tell me whether it works now. > Hi Tom, > > first, I did apply your patch - even though I do not > think the require org-agenda should be needed. I agree. But since debugging at a distance is painful, and org-map-entries calls agenda functions, I am trying to play it safe. One other play-it-safe change in the patch: (require 'cl) is now on its own, not inside `eval-when-compile'. I realized last night that I always have `cl' loaded, so maybe that was the difference between my setup and others'. > I also did make the change (not pushed yet) 'org -> "org", also because > this is compatible with XEmacs, the symbol version not. Thank you. And thank you for your patience with this. Tom Breton (Tehom)