From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "bva@alexanderonline.org" Subject: Re: Emacs-orgmode Digest, Vol 26, Issue 34 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:04:35 +0100 Message-ID: <0F5CB3CE-98B7-4242-A07E-12539846FA5C@alexanderonline.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl5dH-0001pt-Q6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:04:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl5dG-0001o2-2P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:04:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl5dF-0001ni-Ov for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:04:45 -0400 Received: from harley.gnservers.com ([72.52.242.16]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl5dF-00069m-9z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:04:45 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: raman@users.sf.net Hi Carsten, I thought I'd jump in with my 2 pennies: http:foo.html is a bad habit because (just perhaps) the HTML file isn't accessed by http, and then the internal links break. So if the generated HTML documents are stored locally (I fantasize that someday my PSP will be able to do this) and accessed using a file:// link, the HTML spec requires the browser to ditch the protocol and use the specified one, which won't work if my PSP is offline. -Ben On 2008-04-13 Sun, at 17:54:33 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:54:33 +0200 > From: Carsten Dominik > Subject: Re: [Orgmode] export to html and relative links: > To: raman@users.sf.net > Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > > On Apr 13, 2008, at 5:33 PM, T. V. Raman wrote: > >> I've not tried http:foo.html -- but I suggest doing that to >> author a relative URL is a bad idea. > > Can you explain why you think that this is a bad idea? > Educate me! What is wrong with writing http:foo.html ?????? > > - Carsten >