From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Logging state change with timestamp, but without note Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:46:58 +0100 Message-ID: <07684788-6C6C-4B90-8C02-96E60DEC2F74@science.uva.nl> References: <47B39DB7.2020706@gmail.com> <87prv0ckos.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87skzvfyaz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPeQZ-0003QW-Mx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:47:03 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPeQX-0003Pj-Oo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:47:03 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPeQX-0003Pe-J3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:47:01 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPeQX-00078L-DH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:47:01 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so1101688ugf.48 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:47:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87skzvfyaz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Wanrong Lin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Feb 14, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Bastien wrote: > Carsten Dominik writes: > >> I am not sure this i a complete enough solution. If I understand >> Wanrong >> correctly, >> I think he wants to be able to define the specific states that should >> record a time. > > Yes, my patch was just doing part of the job. I wanted to check > whether > such a workaround would be hard to implement. > >> So I guess a complete solution would be to introduce a character >> like "!", >> similar to the "@" we are already using to denote taking a note. So >> >> #+TODO: TODO(t) WAITING(w@) | DELEGATED DONE CANCELED(c!) >> >> would record a note when switching to WAITING, and only a time when >> switching to CANCELED. > > Indeed. > > Do you want me to work on this? > > BTW I think letting "%!" in `org-log-note-headings' would still be > useful. > > For example, if someone uses "#+STARTUP: lognotedone", then any switch > to a DONE state will require a note, no matter whether there is a "@" > cookie appended at the end of the DONE state or not. In this case, I > guess some people would find it useful to put "%!" in the 'done cell > of > `org-log-note-headings'. > > What do you think? Would that be too much or a bit redundant? I guess a different way would be #+STARTUP: logstate in analogy to logdone? - Carsten > > > -- > Bastien