From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OMXDJQXujl+GfwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:02:45 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id 4IiiIQXujl+4cgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:02:45 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59EC9401BE for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38158 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsDr-00045z-F9 for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:02:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsCG-0003ac-VI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:01:14 -0400 Received: from grinta.net ([109.74.203.128]:45272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUsC6-000544-IT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:01:02 -0400 Received: from black.local (unknown [46.165.233.56]) (Authenticated sender: daniele) by grinta.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11B99EC5AA for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:00:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=grinta.net; s=2020; t=1603202452; bh=OXE+2QfgxZfhZXu8RKo+r/MEY5Gf5bL5bZ+QsxD4lHI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Byb6Yu1Xmt55SU+P/XhePyu+ykkiW/jKXvmLZ9cIsNn6l0+ziZzjCsN5KFpzg/GR9 U+x1srvXznifO7+c3j3kvT5p9521kuqRhUqmec1Lo9g8kbcR//9LUhklH8KFBVfL0r yKfJ4cy7mHRtA80g0F2JkKqdf3rHiQ4kTV+HxNCd27VRuHZeHz89FRII9HZ6MZekQF f6F11bWetFaBb1GzSWN//4K4jIu1AxD5heLcbrFtc5Pe1klAe7aqqGtEqUiZaQlpBP dhYdJj3PrKwzX1mXYRg8wEXEXMtWgltDJz/n0jiXk84mS0upHAsAGwcHBAGm8hfX+F 087JKHlQ24KtQ== Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-table: Add mode flag to enable Calc units simplification mode To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org References: <6d8c15c2-d1b0-d913-df39-c60381cff70b@grinta.net> <33143b05-a298-8277-313b-3a1deb69ad27@grinta.net> <87pn5dui49.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> From: Daniele Nicolodi Message-ID: <057ba10f-0fba-d14d-a1b8-bc585e16314c@grinta.net> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:00:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pn5dui49.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=109.74.203.128; envelope-from=daniele@grinta.net; helo=grinta.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/20 09:30:02 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=grinta.net header.s=2020 header.b=Byb6Yu1X; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: 9LRwl6LFoxFW On 20/10/2020 15:44, Eric S Fraga wrote: > Just to say that I have done a quick test with this and I really like > it. Simple calculations with units of mol/s and mol/min work perfectly. Thank you for testing Eric. To cover the use case of monetary quantities discussed in the other thread I would like to also add an `m?` (or M?) flag that can combine the effect of the existing `f?` flag and the new `u` flag. But I don't know if sparing one character is worth one character in the small flag characters set. Cheers, Dan