From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Thomas S. Dye" Subject: Re: Re: IMPORTANT: (possibly) incompatible Change Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 10:01:27 -1000 Message-ID: <055203D9-970B-432D-92F8-2BE090DA7B98@tsdye.com> References: <86sk7gooh2.fsf@portan.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> <3E3E058D-6BBD-4D9B-845D-3E13235EF0DC@gmail.com> <4BB3973D.3090305@comcast.net> <9667B267-935B-4DFB-800B-FC76DBCCBF28@gmail.com> <8739z8g3ul.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <871ves8t5f.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <2D73D1C7-5BEF-46D2-9A56-4F4321005550@gmail.com> <87wrwk7cf7.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <6DA7F0F0-D60E-4214-889A-C5A135970E7B@tsdye.com> <6500482A-2E3D-4311-889B-77E33F82E72A@gmail.com> <87sk778yen.fsf@ara.blue-cable.net> <4BC0B5CB.1040108@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O0gs8-00051j-Qr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:01:40 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51988 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O0gs7-00050o-CE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:01:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0gs5-0003RM-Dr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:01:39 -0400 Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com ([66.147.249.253]:44500 helo=outbound-mail-359.bluehost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O0gs5-0003Qs-40 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:01:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BC0B5CB.1040108@comcast.net> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark Elston Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Apr 10, 2010, at 7:30 AM, Mark Elston wrote: > On 4/7/2010 1:22 AM, Karsten Heymann wrote: >> >> Carsten Dominik writes: >>> On Apr 6, 2010, at 8:48 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: >>>> From the microtype documentation: >>>> >>>>> The microtype package does not work with XETEX. >>> >>> Does that mean it will break running XETEX, or will i just be >>> ignored? >> >> It only gives a (harmless) warning: >> >> Package microtype Warning: You don't seem to be using pdftex. >> (microtype) All micro-typographic features will be >> disabled. >> >> But chances are high that most "normal" LaTeX documents will not work >> with xelatex anyways due to encoding or font selection issues, so I >> think unless org-mode aims at explicitely supporting XeTeX out of the >> box this whole topic can (and should) be ignored. > > I am having problems with microtype, here. I don't know if it is > happening in all my docs or just the ones I am working with now but > pdf generation fails with the following in the log: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > ... > (Handouts07.out) (Handouts07.out) > ("C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.7\tex\latex\wasysym\uwasy.fd") > ("C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.7\tex\latex\base\ulasy.fd") > ("C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.7\tex\latex\amsfonts\umsa.fd") > ("C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.7\tex\latex\microtype\mt-msa.cfg") > ("C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.7\tex\latex\amsfonts\umsb.fd") > ("C:\Program Files (x86)\MiKTeX 2.7\tex\latex\microtype\mt-msb.cfg") > [1{C:/Prog > ramData/MiKTeX/2.7/pdftex/config/pdftex.map} > ! pdfTeX error (font expansion): auto expansion is only possible > with scalable > fonts. > \AtBegShi@Output ...ipout \box \AtBeginShipoutBox > \fi \fi > l.111 S > harezer = Babylonian name, sharusur, ``protect the king.'' > ! ==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced! > Transcript written on Handouts07.log. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > If I comment out the \usepackage{microtype} line then everything works > fine. I am a casual user of latex so I don't really know what the > comment above about scalable fonts is getting at. Perhaps I can set > my docs up to do something different in terms of fonts to make this > just work. > > Any ideas? > > Mark > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode Hi Mark, Removing microtype is probably the easiest solution. It performs some sophisticated micro-typographic adjustments that are typically found in published material. The LaTeX world got on fine without them for years and the casual LaTeX user can still do so. AFAIK, it is not necessary for the Org-mode LaTeX exporter. All the best, Tom