From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: information/feature request: org analog to latex \description environment Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:46:48 +0200 Message-ID: <0332730D-8E66-4FB8-BA9C-62A15CD8057B@uva.nl> References: <87od2xw1fj.fsf@gmail.com> <87zlmhgjnv.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <8763p5vz05.fsf@gmail.com> <87prndghe1.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <877i9l0xo2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdJTm-0001pQ-Lr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:47:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KdJTi-0001pE-6P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:47:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49820 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KdJTi-0001pB-0Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:47:02 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:36402) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KdJTh-0005Zm-OK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:47:01 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.231]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KdJTg-0000ka-HL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:47:00 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s15so807215wxc.24 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:46:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877i9l0xo2.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Schulte Cc: emacs-orgmode Mailinglist On Sep 10, 2008, at 12:19 AM, Eric Schulte wrote: > Sebastian Rose writes: > >>> ,---- >>> | first term: and it's definition >>> | second: and it's definition >>> `---- >> >> >> How should Org distinguish those colons from other colons? > > yes, I suppose the double colons you show below would be required > >>> would be much preferable to what I currently often find myself doing >>> which is >>> >>> ,---- >>> | - *first term*: and it's definition >>> | - *second*: and it's definition >>> `---- >> >> >> This is what I did too :-) I even wrote a little little elisp >> function >> to do this for me. But since a few weeks there is: >> >> >> - Term1 :: description (try to press ALT-RET here) >> - Term2 :: description (try to press ALT-RET here) However, this syntax is only supported by the HTML backend, not by the LaTeX backend yet.... :-( - Carsten