From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 5lYlNQbCsl+VWAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:16:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id QG+dMAbCsl8afAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:16:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8423A94021E for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58194 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kej3N-0008Dj-0k for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:16:37 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33452) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keizv-0005lZ-28 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:13:04 -0500 Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214]:45634 helo=ciao.gmane.io) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keizs-00006k-Lo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:13:02 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1keizn-0000kp-JT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:12:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: gyro funch Subject: Re: Changed list indentation behavior: how to revert? Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:12:50 -0700 Message-ID: <01c3b019-2703-6c0c-988a-7bdbbd7b8a96@gmail.com> References: <2020-11-13T18-23-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <874klqew77.fsf@web.de> <20201115122154.50ad1503@linux-h0yu.fritz.box> <87tutq67ka.fsf@gmail.com> <87tutpvppm.fsf@kyleam.com> <871rgtwzrs.fsf@web.de> <87y2j1ahqf.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9e5uw2u.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3 Cc: emacs-orgmode In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/16 11:02:13 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.59 X-TUID: WVAAgP69kC8s On 11/16/2020 9:26 AM, Tom Gillespie wrote: > Would it help if major releases maintained a mini-config that if added > to init.el would allow users to retain old behavior? That way they > wouldn't have to read the NEWS but could just add the relevant lines, > or maybe even just call the org-old-default-behavior-9.1 or > org-old-default-behavior-9.4. The workflow during development would be > to account for any change to defaults in those functions. Thoughts? > Tom > > I hate to open a new can of worms, but could semantic versioning be used such that it is obvious when there are changes that are not backwards compatible? -gyro