From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Chris Randle" <chris@amlog.co.uk>
Subject: RE: Converting dates to org-mode dates
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:45:27 -0000
Message-ID: <00eb01c8253a$aa550a90$6a80a8c0@CUBE>
References: <871wav33t0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IraYT-0002x7-TE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:46:25 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IraYS-0002wg-8r
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:46:25 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IraYS-0002wd-2r
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:46:24 -0500
Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.86])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <chris@amlog.co.uk>) id 1IraYS-0004Up-39
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:46:24 -0500
Received: from amlog.demon.co.uk ([80.177.106.135] helo=CUBE)
	by anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.67)
	id 1IraYP-000Beb-L2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:46:21 +0000
In-Reply-To: <871wav33t0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Bastien wrote:
> Maybe you can try this (not heavily tested):
> 
> (defun my-update-day-name-in-inactive-time-stamps ()
>   "Update the abbreviate day name in inactive time-stamps."

Thank you. It works a treat. It also has a potentially useful
side-effect, in that valid inactive time stamps like:

[2007-11-12 ]

are left untouched, which may well be what some people would want,
whereas if my search replace operations leave:

[2007-11-12 xxx]

then they will be updated. And if I want the former style stamps
updated, your code is clear enough that (even!) I can see how to adjust
it.

Thanks again.

-- 
Chris Randle