From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Colin Fraizer" Subject: Re: Continuation of main section text after subsections Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:42:36 -0400 Message-ID: <00ba01cbfde7$a09800a0$e1c801e0$@cfraizer.com> References: <807hbjg1rm.fsf@somewhere.org> <009801cbfdde$18ef63e0$4ace2ba0$@cfraizer.com> <20110418181700.13af182a@hsdev.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39803) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBrX7-00008o-J5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:42:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBrX6-0002D5-4s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:42:41 -0400 Received: from caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com ([208.113.200.5]:39484 helo=homiemail-a43.g.dreamhost.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBrX5-0002Cs-UC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:42:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110418181700.13af182a@hsdev.com> Content-Language: en-us List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: 'Marcel van der Boom' , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Wow, I missed that part of the discussion, but it sounds very much like what I want. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+orgmode=cfraizer.com@gnu.org [mailto:emacs-orgmode-bounces+orgmode=cfraizer.com@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Marcel van der Boom Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 12:17 PM To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [O] Continuation of main section text after subsections On ma 18-apr-2011 11:34 "Colin Fraizer" wrote: > Was there ever a conclusion from this discussion? > My personal conclusion was, given proper outlining and no or very few assumptions about indentation preferences, it would be very difficult or confusing to implement. The amount of alternatives given in the thread gave me enough food for a while to try out if those would be sufficient. So far, the inline tasks (see below) seem to fit my need the best, although their use feels a bit like a hack to me. > I think I want something very similar to what Mr. van der Boom > requested. I have outlines that contain varying amounts of text > (paragraphs) and then, to avoid forgetting some task, I add a TODO > item somewhere in the middle. That TODO item absorbs all the text > following it until the next headline at the same or higher level. This specific functionality might be already available by using the 'inline tasks' I mentioned above See the function 'org-inlinetask-insert-task'. marcel -- Marcel van der Boom -- http://hsdev.com/mvdb.vcf HS-Development BV -- http://www.hsdev.com So! web applications -- http://make-it-so.info Cobra build -- http://cobra.mrblog.nl