From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mikhail Titov" Subject: Re: How to get to work non-interactive publishing? Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 14:57:10 -0500 Message-ID: <008101cd378b$e993c5d0$bcbb5170$@us> References: <005401cd349f$a4382600$eca87200$@us> <87r4uhk7df.fsf@gmx.com> <4FB8373D.2030305@gmx.us> <87pq9zbxua.fsf@gmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41091) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWYjD-0002vq-5W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 15:57:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWYjB-0006pm-4U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 15:57:14 -0400 Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:52921 helo=mailout-us.mail.com) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWYjA-0006pK-UY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 15:57:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pq9zbxua.fsf@gmx.com> Content-Language: en-us List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: 'Eric Schulte' Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > -----Original Message----- > From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+mlt=3Dgmx.us@gnu.org = [mailto:emacs-orgmode- > bounces+mlt=3Dgmx.us@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Eric Schulte > Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2012 5:39 PM > To: Mikhail Titov > Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [O] How to get to work non-interactive publishing? >=20 > >>> I can publish project if I don=E2=80=99t use =E2=80=93-batch . So = the following works > >>> just fine: emacs -nw --eval '(org-publish-project "myproj")' > >>> > >>> However nothing happens if I try emacs --batch --eval = '(org-publish- > project "myproj")' > ... > >> Using batch mode shouldn't be causing any problems with the export > >> process, is it possible that something in your personal config is = not > >> compatible with batch-mode > ... > > I really did not want to create a separate init file as I was quite > > happy with existing dot emacs. You are right. Something was in the = way. > > After I created a separate file that loads only necessary stuff, it > > published fine. > > >=20 > Happy it works, if you find the offending element of your persona > configuration you could remove it and continue to use your personal > config for batch publishing. > > > > So weird emacs did not give any error before that something is not > > quite right. Is there an option for emacs so that some module can = say > > it can't work in a batch mode? > > >=20 > I don't believe that there is an automated way to raise such warnings. > You could do a binary search through your init. Part of my question was if there is an easy way to find it other than by = dichotomy? I guess not :-) > > I mean what is the point to make a separate init file other than > > speed? > > >=20 > Your main init file is used to customize Emacs for interactive = editing, > many (if not most) of these settings won't apply to batch evaluation. >=20 > By separating your personal customization from the project init file > used for publishing it becomes possible to distribute your project = with > the publication init file without sharing your personal configuration. That makes it clear. Another weird issue I experience when batch-publishing is that even with = a separate init file, I get different "htmlization" of babel blocks. I = mean if I load emacs -nw -Q -l myinit.el project_part.org and publish that with C-c C-e P , then I get nicely colored babel block = in HTML starting like 
  library(RODBC)

However, if I do

emacs -Q --batch -l myinit.el -f 'org-publish-all'

then I get something like


library(RODBC)

It seems odd to me that same config results in different outputs when =
publishing interactively and in a batch mode. I would prefer colored =
output.

What should I pay attention to? I have a feeling that something is not =
loaded which does in interactive mode, or vice versa.

Mikhail