From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Mark S" Subject: Re: Re: Timer mode doesn't hyphenate correctly Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 20:46:12 -0800 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: throaway@yahoo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47593 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5VKp-0001iK-Kn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:47:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5VKo-00067d-La for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:47:43 -0400 Received: from fed1rmfepo103.cox.net ([68.230.241.145]:38570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5VKo-00067H-9x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:47:42 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmfepo103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20110401034739.EIKD20516.fed1rmfepo103.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:47:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hello Nicolas, --- On Thu, 3/31/11, Nicolas wrote: >I cannot reproduce what you are describing. I may be > misunderstanding you. Could you please post an ECM > for that? > What's an ECM? The scenario described has occurred 2 or 3 times now, though I can't figure out the exact sequence. Another thing I've noticed is that sometimes the list items are created in chronological order, and other times in reverse-chronological order. In fact, most of the time it wants to go in reverse-chronological order. Since there's no example in the manual, I'm not sure which one is "normal". I would prefer chronological order, but I can see why some might prefer reverse-chronological. Thanks, Mark