From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEhlcmUgaXMgYSBwYXRjaCBJIHdhbnQgdG8gYWRkIHRvIG9y?= =?UTF-8?B?Zy5lbOKApuKApg==?= Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 22:22:59 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54ED4E97.C3CC91.30527@m12-13.163.com> <87d24yb0u1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <54F0118E.D911F7.27458@m12-15.163.com> <87mw3z8z08.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878ufjpcvz.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRTJP-0005BH-Jq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:23:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRTJM-00061b-Cy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:23:11 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48032) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRTJM-00061S-69 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:23:08 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YRTJJ-0004EP-HG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:23:05 +0100 Received: from cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([81.102.136.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:23:05 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:23:05 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: > Andreas Leha writes: > >> I am talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment'. And even if that is >> fast, it is very annoying behaviour. I'd very much like to be able to >> toggle individual images. In a math-heavy document the redisplay of all >> formula images of even the current section takes noticable moment. But >> much worse: if I am working on a formula, I usually like to see other >> formulas as images. But they disappear as soon as I switch off the >> image of the current formula to debug it. >> >> It is quite hard to even achieve the state where all formulas except the >> formula under the point are displayed as image. >> >> And I'd expect `org-toggle-latex-fragment' to do what its name suggests: >> to toggle the latex fragment, i.e. to produce the same state after the >> second invocation. Similarly to visibility cycling only a prefix should > > Wouldn't the "correctᵀᴹ" behavior be to show the latex-code "under" the > image if point is at image. Like in AUCTeX? [I don't know if it's easily > feasible to have similar behavior]. I agree that this would be nice. But additionally, I'd think. My expectation about toggling latex fragments would still be that it would by default only toggle the current fragment. Maybe that would be less of an issue if the code was visible as well. > > Personally, I never use org-toggle-latex-fragment, but rely on entities, > since org-toggle-latex-fragment is only really good for "static/mature" > documents. I am not sure I understand that. What do you mean when you rely on entities? Just the replacements for \alpha, ...? I think they do not help too much for the more complicated formulas. Maybe I am just out of training when it comes to reading LaTeX... Regards, Andreas