From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEhlcmUgaXMgYSBwYXRjaCBJIHdhbnQgdG8gYWRkIHRvIG9y?=
 =?UTF-8?B?Zy5lbOKApuKApg==?=
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:01:53 +0000
Message-ID: <oluvbimnvtq.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
References: <54ED4E97.C3CC91.30527@m12-13.163.com>
	<87d24yb0u1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<54F0118E.D911F7.27458@m12-15.163.com>
	<olulhjjg0sa.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<87mw3z8z08.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<olu4mq7pe81.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<877fv3rkn8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57426)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YRf9r-0005gW-JJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 06:02:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YRf9o-000161-DX
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 06:02:07 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44075)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YRf9o-00015m-7P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 06:02:04 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YRf9m-0006K6-Ur
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:02:03 +0100
Received: from cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([81.102.136.5])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:02:02 +0100
Received: from andreas.leha by cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net
	with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:02:02 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:
>
>> I am talking about `org-toggle-latex-fragment'.  And even if that is
>> fast, it is very annoying behaviour.  I'd very much like to be able to
>> toggle individual images.  In a math-heavy document the redisplay of all
>> formula images of even the current section takes noticable moment.  But
>> much worse: if I am working on a formula, I usually like to see other
>> formulas as images.  But they disappear as soon as I switch off the
>> image of the current formula to debug it.
>>
>> It is quite hard to even achieve the state where all formulas except the
>> formula under the point are displayed as image.
>>
>> And I'd expect `org-toggle-latex-fragment' to do what its name suggests:
>> to toggle the latex fragment, i.e. to produce the same state after the
>> second invocation.  Similarly to visibility cycling only a prefix should
>> act globally, IMO.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> Would you mind testing the following patch, then? It makes
> `org-toggle-latex-fragment' behave more to your liking.
>

>From my first tests I can say:  I very much like it!  Thanks a lot!

Regards,
Andreas