From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Subject: Re: comment section with latex_header
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:06:05 +0000
Message-ID: <olur3sbykle.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
References: <olulhipz45z.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
	<87d23znv5a.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <55110E84.3060408@roklein.de>
	<87zj72n5xk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <86d23y3gxi.fsf@example.com>
	<5512A024.5050509@roklein.de> <86k2y4b1gt.fsf@example.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34416)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Yb7US-0000Jx-LH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:06:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Yb7UN-0001KD-N6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:06:28 -0400
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55115)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Yb7UN-0001Jy-Gl
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:06:23 -0400
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Yb7U8-00010t-BR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:06:08 +0100
Received: from 193.63.223.66 ([193.63.223.66])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:06:08 +0100
Received: from andreas.leha by 193.63.223.66 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:06:08 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi all,

Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com> writes:
> Robert Klein wrote:
>> On 03/24/2015 10:04 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>>
>>> Can't we say that a COMMENT'ed subtree is like having all of its
>>> contents commented, line by line?  IOW, nothing "accessible"?
>>
>> This would probably break a lot of babel stuff.
>
> Could you elaborate why?
>
>> If there was an option to disable exports for #+NAME:-ed stuff (i.e.
>> data sources for babel), e.g. somtehing like
>>
>> #+NAME: xyzzy :exports none
>> | munich  | 13 |
>> | cologne | 12 |
>>
>> you could deprecate and eventually disable data sources in COMMENT-ed
>> section.
>
> If you *not to export* some stuff in a subtree, adding the "noexport"
> tag would be enough, right?
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

FWIW, I agree that COMMENT should be equivalent to individual line # .
Sections that should be accessible without being exported get
the :noexport: tag.

Is there any usecase for COMMENTed sections that is not covered
by :noexport:?

Regards,
Andreas