From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: superscript without base Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:21:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48403) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYaNQ-000082-AK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:20:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYaNL-0001IQ-R0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:20:44 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34091) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYaNL-0001IJ-IZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:20:39 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YYaNC-00069K-Hf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:20:30 +0100 Received: from 193.63.222.165 ([193.63.222.165]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:20:30 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by 193.63.222.165 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:20:30 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi John, Thanks a lot for your answer. John Kitchin writes: > I suppose $^{foo}$ will do what you want. you may need some additional > \mathrm command if you do not want math fonts. > > or maybe try \textsuperscript{foo} > > (untested) > These both work (you are right about the math font). But obviously only in LaTeX. I did not say explicitly but I'd prefer a more backend-agnostic solution. Best, Andreas > > Andreas Leha writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> quick question: What is the syntax of superscripts without a 'base >> character'? >> >> I tried to use ^{foo} and {}^{foo} which both do not produce what I >> expect in the latex export. >> >> \nbsp^{foo} comes close. >> >> Best, >> Andreas > > -- > Professor John Kitchin > Doherty Hall A207F > Department of Chemical Engineering > Carnegie Mellon University > Pittsburgh, PA 15213 > 412-268-7803 > @johnkitchin > http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu