From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: ":results none" doesn't seem to be documented Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 20:32:41 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54B6E40F.7050902@arfer.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBr5T-00066X-80 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:32:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBr5O-0006Cn-8w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:32:15 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YBr5O-0006Cd-24 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:32:10 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YBr5M-0001e0-TI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 21:32:08 +0100 Received: from cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([81.102.136.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 21:32:08 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 21:32:08 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Samuel, Samuel Wales writes: > On 1/15/15, Andreas Leha wrote: >> Your suggestion seems like the missing thing here. But I am not sure >> how badly needed that is. As John said, the ":results none" argument >> was added to speed things up when the results are huge. I have no idea > > this does not export ime. > >> how much overhead it is to copy the results into the org buffer and into >> the echo area. > > slow ime. I am sorry, but your message is to short for me to make sense of. Best, Andreas