From: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: comment section with latex_header
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 21:02:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <olumw2zxyj3.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87lhijldia.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:
>
>> FWIW, I agree that COMMENT should be equivalent to individual line # .
>
> I hope you mean it should be equivalent during export only. Otherwise,
> it would introduce some serious slowdown as COMMENT can be inherited.
>
I see. I did not consider any possible slow-downs. I'd expect COMMENT
to behave exactly like # in every regard -- not only export. That is a
clearly defined behaviour, that should not produce confusion.
But I am not sure (hence my question below) whether there are use cases
that need different behaviour.
If COMMENT is only valid for export, then I would actually recommend
to rename it to make that clear.
>> Sections that should be accessible without being exported get
>> the :noexport: tag.
>>
>> Is there any usecase for COMMENTed sections that is not covered
>> by :noexport:?
>
> Babel code from a :noexport: headline is executed. It isn't when in
> a COMMENT headline. I think both are useful.
I completely agree. My question was, what a use case would be that
requires a COMMENT that behaves different from #'ing the individual
lines (and is not covered by :noexport: already).
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-26 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-22 11:02 comment section with latex_header Andreas Leha
2015-03-22 11:37 ` Rasmus
2015-03-23 8:31 ` Andreas Leha
2015-03-23 10:01 ` Rasmus
2015-03-23 10:09 ` Andreas Leha
2015-03-23 8:56 ` Sebastien Vauban
2015-03-23 23:36 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-23 23:54 ` Andreas Leha
2015-03-24 7:13 ` Robert Klein
2015-03-24 8:41 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-24 9:04 ` Sebastien Vauban
2015-03-25 11:46 ` Robert Klein
2015-03-26 8:35 ` Sebastien Vauban
2015-03-26 13:06 ` Andreas Leha
2015-03-26 20:17 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-26 21:02 ` Andreas Leha [this message]
2015-03-27 11:02 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-27 11:24 ` Andreas Leha
2015-03-27 12:09 ` Robert Klein
2015-03-28 15:00 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-03-26 20:14 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=olumw2zxyj3.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de \
--to=andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).