From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: superscript without base Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 13:30:29 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87mw399lls.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYaW0-0006WP-3P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:29:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYaVu-0003fj-Fy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:29:36 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYaVu-0003fb-99 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:29:30 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YYaVs-0004eY-GE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:29:28 +0100 Received: from 193.63.222.165 ([193.63.222.165]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:29:28 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by 193.63.222.165 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:29:28 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: > John Kitchin writes: > >> or maybe try \textsuperscript{foo} > > This would work in at least KOMA-Script. > > Check org-match-substring-regexp. As you see at subscripts must start > with something that's not a space. So I guess you could use a filter to > remove some otherwise unused character or the the like... Or change the > the syntax table changed so that zero width space is somehow not an \s, > but that's probably asking for trouble. > Thanks for the answer. So, there is no easy way out. I think I'll stick to the \nbsp version, then. Although introducing some character that will be removed during export through a filter might be handy in other cases, too. I'll think about it. Thanks, Andreas