From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: export: noweb blocks substituted versus verbatim ? Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:45:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34118) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfyEJ-0007rx-N6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:46:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfyEF-0006xs-MF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:46:07 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfyEF-0006xG-Ge for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:46:03 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZfyED-0005Qt-It for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 00:46:01 +0200 Received: from cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([81.102.136.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 00:46:01 +0200 Received: from andreas.leha by cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 00:46:01 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Brian, Brian Beckman writes: > Hello -- I have a situation where some code blocks with noweb references in > them <> are substituted inline when I export the document, and > other code blocks with noweb references, are copied verbatim into the > exported PDF. I do not know what causes this difference in behavior and I > don't know how to control it, but I'd like to control it. I'd like to be > able to specify that some blocks have behavior 1 (references substituted > inline) and other blocks have behavior 2 (references verbatim). > > I'm sure this is pilot error, but I'm stumped and would be grateful for advice. [[ omitted: the MVE ]] As far as I can see, the difference is that some of the code blocks have the header argument `:noweb yes', while others do not. I do not know how to achieve working noweb extension during evaluation but omitting noweb extension during export, though. HTH, Andreas