From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: comment section with latex_header Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:09:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87iodtuutc.fsf@gmx.us> <874mpc6nii.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzIg-000562-35 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:09:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzIb-00069T-3S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:09:38 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzIa-00069J-TS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 06:09:33 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YZzIX-0000DK-2h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:09:29 +0100 Received: from 193.63.222.189 ([193.63.222.189]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:09:29 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by 193.63.222.189 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:09:29 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: > Andreas Leha writes: > >> Hi Rasmus, >> >> Rasmus writes: >>> Andreas Leha writes: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> If there are `#+latex_header:' entries in a section and that section is >>>> `COMMENT'ed out, I'd expect the #+latex_header entries to be >>>> uneffective. As they are when I comment them out one by one as in >>>> `# #+latex_header:'. >>>> >>>> Is this a bug? (I'd say, yes....) >>> >>> Why? I guess you can still archive >> >> Could you expand on that? > > Sorry, I must have clicked C-c C-c by accident. > > #+LATEX_HEADERs in :noexport: sections are included. I guess that code in > COMMENT sections aren't included. So I guess keywords could also be > excluded. I don't know. > > —Rasmus Thanks, Andreas