From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Subject: Re: org-html-use-unicode-chars breaks source code blocks
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 22:09:05 +0100
Message-ID: <olu8u9lmqry.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
References: <loom.20150804T153529-191@post.gmane.org> <871tfjq7mb.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87zj26gart.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87zj23h168.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87egjftmd4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87614r2wow.fsf@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33007)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1ZOBMi-0002WP-Bg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:09:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1ZOBMd-0001ze-Cv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:09:16 -0400
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51657)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1ZOBMd-0001zY-5n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:09:11 -0400
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1ZOBMb-0002h6-I9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 23:09:09 +0200
Received: from p5b0ed23a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.14.210.58])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 23:09:09 +0200
Received: from andreas.leha by p5b0ed23a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 23:09:09 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

[ deleted: discussion on beatification ]

>
> My initial reaction was to kill it as well.  But I might feel like this a
> bit to often (I feel the same way about headline keywords like COMMENT).

There has been repeated 'bashing' of the COMMENT keyword lately on this
list.  Let me just raise a voice in defence.  I do not mind the syntax
too much, but the functionality of commenting a whole subtree without
loosing the outline functionality is really handy.  Especially also in
distinction to the equally handy :noexport: tag.

So, even if there is probably not a high risk for the COMMENT keyword to
be dropped I just wanted to express my support for it.

Regards,
Andreas