From: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: math in parentheses
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:30:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <olu7fzkje4q.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87sii8yv4v.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:
> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Richard Lawrence <richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu> writes:
>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>
>>> Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> I encounter a problem using $..$ expressions when they are enclosed
>>>> in parentheses.
>>>
>>>> This $T$ works, but ($T$) this does not.
>>>>
>>>> Is that expected behaviour?
>>>>
>>>> (Note that \(...\) expressions work.)
>>>
>>> Yes, that is the expected behavior. Org is much pickier about when "$"
>>> can be a math delimiter than "\( ... \)". The reason is that "$" can
>>> also be used as a regular symbol in Org documents; when it is, it should
>>> be *not* be exported as a math delimiter to LaTeX, and distinguishing
>>> non-math-delimiting from math-delimiting uses of "$" is not a trivial
>>> matter.
>>>
>>> Thus, when in doubt, use "\( ... \)".
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for following that up. I do use \(...\) when I encounter
>> problems with $...$ (which is a lot nicer to type and read).
>>
>> I am happy with using the fall-back \(...\) every now and then.
>>
>> Just for me to understand: Is the problem the missing whitespace
>> around the $...$ expression?
>>
>
> See
>
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/510/are-and-preferable-to-dollar-signs-for-math-mode
>
> for some arguments for and (mostly) against (although one of the "for"s
> is Frank Mittelbach - which surely tilts the scale quite a lot).
Thanks. A very good read. These are arguments on the LaTeX end. My
question was more on the orgmode end, I guess.
> FWIW,
> I've trained myself to use \(...\) and don't find it any harder to read
> than $...$ - and I don't mind the extra typing either. The fact that
> both org and MathJax deal better with \(...\) just reinforces that
> choice.
I do not agree with the readability but I can live (quite happily) with
using \(...\). And maybe my perception of the readability changes over
time....
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-28 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-28 12:54 math in parentheses Andreas Leha
2014-10-28 15:50 ` Richard Lawrence
2014-10-28 16:03 ` Andreas Leha
2014-10-28 16:31 ` Rasmus
2014-10-28 16:57 ` Andreas Leha
2014-10-28 22:32 ` Rasmus
2014-10-29 9:55 ` Andreas Leha
2014-10-28 17:14 ` Nick Dokos
2014-10-28 17:30 ` Andreas Leha [this message]
2014-10-29 12:24 ` Rasmus
2014-10-29 13:03 ` Nick Dokos
2014-10-31 18:09 ` Eric S Fraga
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=olu7fzkje4q.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de \
--to=andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).