From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: get name of source block Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 15:46:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <86pp5yz2lq.fsf@example.com> <87siauru27.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46165) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuMIg-0006Nz-OQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 10:45:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuMIc-0006Za-LL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 10:45:50 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuMIc-0006ZQ-ER for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 10:45:46 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YuMIY-0001aL-KI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 May 2015 16:45:42 +0200 Received: from cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net ([81.102.136.5]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 16:45:42 +0200 Received: from andreas.leha by cpc33-cmbg15-2-0-cust4.5-4.cable.virginm.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 May 2015 16:45:42 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Andreas Leha writes: > >> During export (and preview (C-c C-v v)) the code block name is not >> displayed. > > See `org-babel-exp-code-template'. > Thanks for looking into this. If I get you correctly, you are suggesting a way to have the name of the code block shown in the exported file. What I am after is to have the name of the code block shown *in the R session* during evaluation at export (to easily see where things fail). Sorry for being unclear. If your hint helps there as well, could you elaborate a bit? Thanks, Andreas