From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEhlcmUgaXMgYSBwYXRjaCBJIHdhbnQgdG8gYWRkIHRvIG9y?= =?UTF-8?B?Zy5lbOKApuKApg==?= Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:40:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54ED4E97.C3CC91.30527@m12-13.163.com> <87d24yb0u1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <54F0118E.D911F7.27458@m12-15.163.com> <87mw3z8z08.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fv3rkn8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mq3aq2j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45261) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSjO0-00026Z-U6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 04:45:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSjNv-0007CV-P2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 04:45:08 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34447) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSjNv-0007BX-IW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 04:45:03 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YSjNu-0000Xt-Ju for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:45:02 +0100 Received: from 193.63.221.107 ([193.63.221.107]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:45:02 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by 193.63.221.107 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:45:02 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Andreas Leha writes: > Hi Nicolas, > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> Andreas Leha writes: >> >>> I spoke a little too soon. I still like it, but there is a regression. >>> See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/95563 >> >> Indeed. I also fixed a few other things. Here's the update. >> >> Thanks for the feedback. > > Thanks for that, which is much better! > > A small issue I still see is, that without prefix on the headline of a > section it claims to work on the section, but does so only if all > fragments in the section are overlaid or all are not overlaid. > > So, in the example below, if only the first formula is overlaid, C-c C-x > C-l on the first headline has no effect. > > I do not mind, actually. But according to the documentation and to the > message in the minibuffer it should do something, IMO. > > Regards, > Andreas On some more testing, this description is wrong. C-c C-x C-l never does anything on the first headline, e.g., which I think it should. Regards, Andreas > > PS: The example again: > > #+begin_org > * section 1 > ** section 1.1 > *** section 1.1.1 > $\alpha=1$ > *** section 1.1.2 > $\alpha=2$ > ** section 1.2 > $\alpha=3$ > > * section 2 > ** section 2.1 > $\alpha=4$ > ** section 2.2 > $\alpha=5$ > #+end_org