From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Lindner Subject: Re: Why is Org PDF LaTeX Output not readonly? Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:33:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87o9y3pm8m.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <878tp7o1fd.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceHVO-00020J-8Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:33:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceHVI-0006sY-5X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:33:34 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=50197 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceHVH-0006rh-U6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:33:28 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ceHV7-0006C2-Sk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:33:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878tp7o1fd.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 15.02.2017 um 17:37 schrieb Eric S Fraga: > On Wednesday, 15 Feb 2017 at 16:07, Florian Lindner wrote: >> The exported PDF opens in okular (xdg-open) and I'm perfectly happy with it. I think we're talking about different >> things. I mean the buffer that contains the output of the latex command and potential error message, looking like: > > Oh, sorry, I misunderstood. Well, as Nick says, does it really matter > as editing it won't affect anything? > > Funnily enough, I never see this buffer unless I go looking for > it. Maybe there's an org setting that causes this buffer to be > displayed or not? I cannot see one. It would be much easier to close it quickly this way and it would be consistent with other buffers that serve the same purpose, like the beforementioned Auctex output buffer. For me, it would just the right thing. Florian