From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vaidheeswaran C Subject: Re: ox-texinfo: Link to dedicated to target doesn't work Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 14:06:22 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87eglzqsvw.fsf@selenimh.access.network> <55691F09.4020305@gmail.com> <87siaexysv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Reply-To: vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34230) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YycGp-0003om-OH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 04:37:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YycGm-0007W5-IT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 04:37:31 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YycGl-0007Vw-W6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 04:37:28 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YycGk-0006bX-9Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:37:26 +0200 Received: from 106.216.232.196 ([106.216.232.196]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:37:26 +0200 Received: from vaidheeswaran.chinnaraju by 106.216.232.196 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 May 2015 10:37:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87siaexysv.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Saturday 30 May 2015 01:49 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Vaidheeswaran C writes: > >> > A canonical DESCRIPTION is NOT available. (YET) The ANCHOR should >> > still get through to the `texi' file, right? > We can replace a silly behaviour with another silly one, yes. But is > there any non-silly one? Displaying a silly link is a call for an action (to fix). So, from fixability perspective, having a silly anchor is better than pruning it from output. >> > This is the output I see in other backends (that support anchors). >> > >> > HTML: >> > >> >

>> > Jump to No description for this link. >> >

> The example above is a bit misleading because a description is not > mandatory. In your situation, Option "num:t" would be sufficient to > produce something. I understand that the error is in the OPTIONs that I have and I need to fix the Org file. Your argument is sound. (BUT) Having some feedback that something is amisss is always desirable. >> > LaTeX: >> > >> > Jump to \ref{orgtarget1}. > If you look at it, this will not appear in the (PDF) output as there's > nothing to refer to, much like what happens in ox-texinfo. I see a red box (which is an urgent call for action). > In any case, what exactly do you suggest in this situation, i.e., what > should be displayed? How about @ref{orgtarget1}? ---------------------------------------------------------------- ps: I can send in fixes. I have a copyright assignment. WDYT?