From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Baumann Subject: Re: strange bug using emacs -nw and org.mode Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 09:54:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KjUdy-0000dF-Ea for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:55:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KjUdt-0000ak-GD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:55:09 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60345 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KjUdt-0000ah-9S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:55:05 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:1225) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KjUds-000195-Ea for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:55:04 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KjUdp-00071r-Os for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 03:55:02 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KjUdl-0003x6-Ul for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:54:57 +0000 Received: from p549675e0.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.150.117.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:54:57 +0000 Received: from dtbaumann by p549675e0.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 2008 07:54:57 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Richard Riley Hi Richard, could you please send "not working" example files for this behaviour. Please also take a close look at the coding systems, they might be different on X and in the terminal. Things seem to be fine with emacs 23 although the umlauts are not coded correctly. Thomas