From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lawrence Mitchell Subject: Re: Export options being ignored Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 09:08:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <24377.1304570014@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <24788.1304572094@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHtc8-0006i1-2X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 04:08:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHtc6-0000TT-WD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 04:08:48 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHtc6-0000TK-Kp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 04:08:46 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHtc3-0006KB-QK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 10:08:43 +0200 Received: from e4300lm.epcc.ed.ac.uk ([129.215.63.156]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 10:08:43 +0200 Received: from wence by e4300lm.epcc.ed.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 10:08:43 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik wrote: > On 5.5.2011, at 07:08, Nick Dokos wrote: [...] >> explains the problem: \< matches the empty string at the beginning of a >> word (i.e. if the syntax class of the next character is "word") but it >> does not at the beginning of a char that is of some other syntax class >> (I think it will not match anything in this case). So Eden diagnosed it >> correctly: it *is* a parsing problem and it *does* involve the non-word >> options. > This is fixed now, by looking for white space instead of beginning-of-word. > Thanks for the analysis. Indeed, thanks. Lawrence -- Lawrence Mitchell