From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tommy Kelly Subject: Basic organization question Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:35:40 -0600 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36525 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pdwvr-0002y1-Cd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:36:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdwvq-0005sS-3M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:36:03 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdwvp-0005sC-U1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:36:02 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pdwvm-0004Jy-OU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 04:35:58 +0100 Received: from cpe-70-112-150-104.austin.res.rr.com ([70.112.150.104]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 04:35:58 +0100 Received: from tommy.kelly by cpe-70-112-150-104.austin.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 04:35:58 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org I can see that TODOs can be organized using tags, or categories, or files, or simply subtrees (or several of those). Is there an obvious choice? All I'm really looking for is a basic organization, to let me "group" tasks of different broad functional areas -- accounting, recruitment, IT, and so on. And I like the idea discussed in http://orgmode.org/org.html, where tasks get captured into a single refile.org file and then later moved about into their classification homes. But of those various ways of classifying, is there one to be preferred? thanks, Tommy