From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Kitchin Subject: Re: Citations, continued Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:54:11 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87sieokx8e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d04780.cb58460a.5243.2603@mx.google.com> <87h9v3li8t.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d078ff.b044440a.06ec.3cf6@mx.google.com> <87d25rkmag.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54d1bc7b.c57d440a.3c5d.2dca@mx.google.com> <87vbjh284z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4tk4m7.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87oap7z664.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvaibr3k.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87y4o9s5qc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d25kpxap.fsf@pank.eu> <87k2zsso3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbjcoewx.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnl4shqg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h9uwwmgt.fsf@gmx.us> <87zj8oqqtz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL01u-0006HY-3T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:54:23 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL01q-00035s-R6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:54:22 -0500 Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu ([128.2.157.38]:54259) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YL01q-00035o-Mg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:54:18 -0500 In-reply-to: <87zj8oqqtz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Rasmus Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> PS: Here's a quick link "proof-of-concept" (not really) with biblatex >> only, and cite it textcitation. Documents with this type of syntax are >> indeed pleasant to the eye. >> >> [[cite: pre1 @bohringer14 post1; pre2 @davis14 post2]] > > As pointed out already, the double square bracket is not needed, and can > introduce ambiguity with links. > > I'm fine with > > [cite: pre1 @bohringer14 post1; pre2 @davis14 post2] Why cannot there be a list of acceptable keywords eg [citenum: [citeyear: [citeauthor: which a backend would be responsible for handling, including a default handler for unknown keywords? > > but how do you distinguish between in-text and in-parenthesis? > > Also, how do you extract year or journal from the key (since you > suggested these features in the first place)? > > > Regards, -- Professor John Kitchin Doherty Hall A207F Department of Chemical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 412-268-7803 @johnkitchin http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu