From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] [ODT] Annotations break paragraphs
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:58:20 +0100
Message-ID: <m2y5d7z1g3.fsf@christianmoe.com>
References: <m2vc8kjvud.fsf@christianmoe.com> <871ub3o6mn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<m2wqsvbgqv.fsf@christianmoe.com> <87ip4f9zqa.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<m2vc8fntaw.fsf@christianmoe.com> <87r4j35ejb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
	<87ip4fxh1e.fsf@gmail.com> <kirg0t$1pm$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<87k3osg7xg.fsf@gmail.com> <kj0nl6$bmv$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<87vc8by4ci.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44798)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1ULJsX-0002s6-JG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:56:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1ULJsW-0002Hq-NO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:56:57 -0400
Received: from mail2.b1.hitrost.net ([91.185.211.205]:28922)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@christianmoe.com>) id 1ULJsW-0002HX-Gf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:56:56 -0400
In-reply-to: <87vc8by4ci.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Achim Gratz <Stromeko@Nexgo.DE>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


> Speaking of inlined elements, I repeat that [note:label] within the
> paragraph should offer a good markup for annotations.

I agree, and favor a move from annotation blocks to a solution like
that.[note:1]

[note:1] That is, like this?

One thing to consider is whether this markup should support author and
timestamp info in a way that the parser should understand and pass on to
relevant backends. The annotation blocks do[note:1], because ODT does.

[note:2] C.Moe <2013-03-28 Thu 21:34>: Except that they don't properly
  support it at the moment, as I brought up in another message.

One could even use the author/timestamp information to form unique
labels,[note:C.Moe_2013-03-28_21:37:26] but the labels would get long
and messy.

[note:C.Moe_2013-03-28_21:37:26] Like this. 

Yours,
Christian