From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: FR: Using properties to customize global settings on a per-entry basis Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:34:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: <93a9124009e1ee0ce55829e44bf3a878@science.uva.nl> <87fy0ri1dq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <9cc854bff9d3fff72a5a9f7ed87235de@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IdtsB-0007wX-9T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:34:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Idts9-0007wL-Nd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:34:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Idts9-0007wI-La for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:34:09 -0400 Received: from johnwiegley.com ([208.70.150.153] helo=mail.johnwiegley.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Idts9-0007nu-3s for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:34:09 -0400 Received: from Hermes.local (unknown [72.22.154.84]) by mail.johnwiegley.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DEE4224CD for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:34:07 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <9cc854bff9d3fff72a5a9f7ed87235de@science.uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Fri\, 5 Oct 2007 10\:02\:21 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik writes: >> I think using LOGGING is a bit better. > > So what do I do? More votes? If you want to start using the facility for generally overriding Lisp values, then your original proposal is better. But if this is just going to be for a few exceptions, LOGGING fits much better with the present scheme and docs. John