From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Erik L. Arneson" Subject: Re: Publishing bug: FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0 Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 17:46:52 -0600 Message-ID: References: <87bp6sn4zl.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1866036366==" Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51052 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P7cwf-00023e-25 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:47:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P7cwe-0008Rw-2l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:47:16 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:52520) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P7cwd-0008Rd-OK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:47:16 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P7cwa-0004cA-JJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:47:12 +0200 Received: from 201.206.157.30 ([201.206.157.30]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:47:12 +0200 Received: from dybbuk by 201.206.157.30 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 01:47:12 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --===============1866036366== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Sebastian Rose wrote: > "Erik L. Arneson" writes: >> On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Erik L. Arneson wrote: >>> I'm running into a very strange bug when publishing to HTML. Even when >>> a page contains no footnotes, a footnote section is added with one >>> footnote an the text "FOOTNOTE DEFINITION NOT FOUND: 0". >> >> I am, by the way, running the latest 7.01trans from Git. I just now did >> an update and this strange footnote behavior is still happening. > > Do you have a `[0]' somewhere in your text? Ah, I found it! In one of the files I'm using via #+INCLUDE there is some JavaScript in an HTML block with [0] in it. I'm going to experiment with getting that to work properly, but it still seems odd that a #+BEGIN_HTML block would be able to include footnotes. =2D-=20 Erik Arneson GPG Key ID : 1024D/62DA1D25 BitCoin : 1LqvuGUqJ4ZUSoE7YE9ngETjwp4yZ2uSdP Office : +1.541.291.9776 Skype : callto://pymander http://www.leisurenouveau.com/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAky7ivYACgkQ/hCCSGLaHSV+9ACgsm/Px0sAJFv8RmgAI5gfUYSX MXYAni/ruYUaaUZfVnEK+lJ0uPzOGF43 =BsWS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1866036366== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode --===============1866036366==--