From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye)
Subject: Re: [Babel] Bug reading example blocks?
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 14:37:37 -1000
Message-ID: <m2wqgle46m.fsf@tsdye.com>
References: <m161rkgwwr.fsf@poto.myhome.westell.com>
	<CAJcAo8sJOHw1Zn6hyuDaP+Vro0HgnseaP1YODuL-m82zGwgCHw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59218)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1WHjYP-0004fo-C7
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:38:00 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>) id 1WHjYI-0008Q3-ES
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:37:53 -0500
Received: from oproxy17-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([74.220.201.171]:47525)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tsd@tsdye.com>)
	id 1WHjYI-0008P3-7L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:37:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8sJOHw1Zn6hyuDaP+Vro0HgnseaP1YODuL-m82zGwgCHw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Samuel Wales's message of "Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:20:34 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hi Samuel,

I think not.  I get these results now:

#+call: repeated-text(x="foo",eg=example) :results raw

#+results:
1. this is the first line
2. this is the second line with foo as the value
3. this is the third line

All the best,
Tom

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> hi thomas,
>
> is this still a bug?
>
> samuel
>
>
> On 11/22/13, Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> wrote:
>> Aloha all,
>>
>> Responding to a query by Gary Oberbrunner, I tried to point out the use
>> of example blocks to name arbitrary pieces of text. What I found is that
>> the example block isn't passed whole to a babel source block--whitespace
>> is removed from the first line.
>>
>> * Whitespace on first line of example block removed
>>
>> #+name: example
>> #+begin_example
>>  1. this is the first line
>>  2. this is the second line with %VARIANT% as the value
>>  3. this is the third line
v>> #+end_example
>>
>> #+name: repeated-text
>> #+header: :var x=""
>> #+header: :var eg=""
>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>>   (let ((result))
>>     (setf result (replace-regexp-in-string "%VARIANT%" x eg t))
>>     result)
>> #+end_src
>>
>> #+call: repeated-text(x="foo",eg=example) :results raw
>>
>> #+results:
>> 1. this is the first line
>>  2. this is the second line with foo as the value
>>  3. this is the third line
>>
>> This happens, AFAICT, regardless of the value of
>> org-src-preserve-indentation.
>>
>> Is there a reason for this? Or, is it a bug? Or, am I going about this
>> task in the wrong way?
>>
>> All the best,
>> Tom
>> --
>> Thomas S. Dye
>> http://www.tsdye.com
>>
>>

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com