From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Mankoff Subject: Re: Babel should not work in the subtree marked as not exported Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:57:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wqg0gawq.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhwgettp.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46373) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNNBx-0007t9-1l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:58:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNNBo-0002rP-KJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:58:00 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]:35046) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNNBo-0002rK-FB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 09:57:52 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id to1so8831899ieb.34 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2014 06:57:51 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <87lhwgettp.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Leha Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Andreas, On 2014-03-11 at 09:41, Andreas Leha wrote: > Hi Ken, > > Ken Mankoff writes: > >> On 2014-03-11 at 08:47, zwz wrote: >>> In my setup, there is >>> (setq org-export-exclude-tags '("private" "exclude") >>> >>> and In my test.org: >>> >>> * test >>> >>> ** Not exported :exclude: >>> #+BEGIN_SRC ditaa :file test.png :cmdline -E >>> +--------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >>> x | 0 cRED | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | >>> +--------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ >>> #+END_SRC >>> >>> ** blah blah >>> blah blah blah >>> >>> >>> When I try to export it to pdf, the test.png is still generated, >>> although it is not used for the pdf at all. >>> So I think the export procedure may be optimized for more efficiency. >> >> No, because I often have code and sections I don't want exported, but >> I want their side-effects active. For example, code with sessions >> where part is not exported, but I need that code run so code >> elsewhere, using the same session, is able to run and be exported. >> >> -k. > > > So what is your suggestion for the OP to achieve what he is after? > noexport and noeval at the same time. > I do not have a suggestion. I'm not very familiar with the various options, and didn't know noeval exists. That sounds like a good solution. The OP suggestion of "may be optimized" is vague, but I took it, perhaps incorrectly, to mean "don't run code in noexport sections", hence my disagreement. -k.