From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Abrahams Subject: `f' in agenda view Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:35:53 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38305) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBAmV-0000N5-Ry for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:36:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBAmT-00031u-Ii for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:35:59 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:61051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBAmT-00031Y-GS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:35:57 -0400 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so917620vws.0 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:35:56 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org It always strikes me as odd that `f' in agenda view moves the item forward by a day even if that leaves it still in the past. Typically if I have an overdue item, I just want to schedule it for today or a certain number of days in the future, and as it stands it's even a bit non-obvious when I've finally bumped it up to today if it's a few days old. Shouldn't the first `f' on an overdue item schedule it for today? I'm happy to hack something locally if the group doesn't agree, but moving things around in the past seems like such a corner case that I thought maybe this would be a better default behavior. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com