From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: org-review-schedule Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:29:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87bnvpltu5.fsf@gmail.com> <4848913.XN1uMPlBq6@linux-j9m3.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wejoc-00013k-To for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:33:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WejoW-0005XX-G1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:33:42 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:20996) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WejoW-0005W0-8N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:33:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4848913.XN1uMPlBq6@linux-j9m3.site> (AW's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:20:16 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: AW Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Alexander, On 2014-04-28 09:20, AW writes: > Am Sonntag, 27. April 2014, 10:09:35 schrieb Alan Schmitt: >> On 2014-04-25 10:02, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> > Alan Schmitt writes: >> >> I guess I should have asked: who decides what goes in contrib? >> > >> > The Org maintainer. Another option is to turn it into an ELPA package. >> >> I need to learn how to do this. In the meantime, I've put the code on >> github: https://github.com/brabalan/org-review >> >> Alan > > I'm really interessted in a more sophisticated review system than to > put "REVIEW" on the list of TODO | DONE items. I guess you are having > a good point here and your code will improve orgmode. > > But after reading your initial post and the README on github I'm not > sure how to use your code. > > Could you complete your Example in the README, please? I've just expanded on the README. Please let me know if you have additional questions. > 1. Probably -- sorry, I'm lacking of lisp understanding -- we need to > put the file org-review.el into a place where Emacs can find it. Yes. > 2. It is probably necessary to add (require 'org-review) before the > code in the example into the ".emacs" file, or am I wrong? Yes, it is necessary. > 3. Usually people have something like > > #+TODO: TODO INPUT ASK MAYBE | DONE > > in their org-file or an equivalent in their .emacs file. What will > happen to such customisations? Nothing. Review tracking is done using properties, not keywords. Best, Alan