From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martyn Jago Subject: Re: FYI: Org mode testing framework, Emacs 23 and 22 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:40:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <874o0veejl.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87y5y7oxyt.fsf@gmail.com> <877h5f558c.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87aaaaokpq.fsf@gmail.com> <87botakwru.fsf@gnu.org> <80hb32w4sp.fsf@somewhere.org> <87vcrhyp5g.fsf@gmail.com> <801uu2oagc.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIl06-0002Vt-HA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:41:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIl01-0007e1-VW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:41:22 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57326) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RIl01-0007dq-MJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:41:17 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIkzx-0003uM-Oa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:41:13 +0200 Received: from 88-96-171-138.dsl.zen.co.uk ([88.96.171.138]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:41:13 +0200 Received: from martyn.jago by 88-96-171-138.dsl.zen.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:41:13 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Brian Wightman writes: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Sebastien Vauban > wrote: >> For my information, why do you need to test that 2 suites don't run at the >> same time?  They only write to temp buffers, no?  Can they conflict? > > If they do conflict and only one set of tests should run at a time, > shouldn't the second set of tests be queued up so it runs when the > first is complete? If this isn't done, I could see a situation where > at least one commit remains untested until the next commit. > > my $0.02; > Brian I would think it would make sense to ensure the newly committed code also builds correctly (including info), and why not test back to Emacs 22 also (since that is how this thread came about)? I have set up something similar, and doing all this takes less than 1 minute on my machine. Incidentally, I added info on running tests on Emacs 22 and 23 to Worg at http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tests/index.html Best, Martyn