From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer M Krug Subject: BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2 Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:06:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8F09B93E-FC4D-48B8-A9AB-3EDC0D81EEEF@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMyXj-0000Ho-Mb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:06:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMyXc-0002b7-CX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:06:35 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com ([74.125.83.52]:41583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMyXc-0002b3-6k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:06:28 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id c41so174503eek.39 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 04:06:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8F09B93E-FC4D-48B8-A9AB-3EDC0D81EEEF@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:27:35 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode mode Carsten Dominik writes: > > Hi everyone, > > I have just released version 8.2 of Org mode. This is rather a minor release, > mainly designed to do some stabilization and cleanup before the merge > into Emacs. Bastien will do this next week (?). Just upgraded, to 8.2 and I found a bug: When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened. When I click into the highlighted block, I an "send" to the indirect buffer. This behavior changes, after saving with C-s, even when nothing has been edited: the area in the original org file looses its magic, and looks normal again and can also be edited! he indirect buffer stays functional and, upon close vie C-c ' saves the changes into the original buffer and overwrites changes done in this block. Can somebody please confirm? Rainer -- Rainer M. Krug email: RMKruggmailcom