emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de>
To: Andreas Kiermeier <andreas.kiermeier@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: header arguments, inheritance, and noweb expansion Was: «Macro» expansion in source blocks; code-sharing between blocks
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 12:59:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2tx43j2oj.fsf_-_@krugs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN7vk5RKrHX17WXDepYZty+__7BrS6SHbBjudq7+J3J4ftCEoQ@mail.gmail.com> (Andreas Kiermeier's message of "Fri, 19 Sep 2014 19:49:15 +0930")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4723 bytes --]

Andreas Kiermeier <andreas.kiermeier@gmail.com> writes:

> Thanks Rainer,
>
> but unfortunately this isn't working. I'm sure I'm doing something
> wrong ... somewhere.
>
> In case this makes any difference I have in the document header:
>
> #+PROPERTY: header-args:R :session *R*
> #+PROPERTY: header-args :results output graphics :exports results
>
> I've now changed the source block header to ":exports none :eval no"
> but now there really is nothing in the output.
>
> In fact, the corresponding .tex file now contains:
>
> \begin{table}[h]
> \label{tbl:refyear}
> \caption{Separation outcomes (death or any type of discharge) by
> reference year.}
> nil
> \end{table}
>
> and in the *Message* buffer I now have:
>
> Evaluation of this R code-block (tbl-refyear) is disabled.
> org-babel-exp processing...
> Evaluation of this R code-block (tbl-refyear) is disabled.
> executing Latex code block...
>
> So, this source block really doesn't evaluated at all.

This boils down to the question I asked earlier about header-args and
+header args, inheritance of header arguments and this in contrast to
normal header args.  

Based on this discussion, I thought that the header arguments count
*where the code is executed* and not where it is defined - well -
surprise for me.

You could try and put the code block with the definition of the code
into a subtree where you set

,----
| :PROPERTIES:
| :headser-args+: eval no
| :END:
`----

This might work?

Rainer

>
> Thanks
>
> Andreas
>
> On 19 September 2014 18:34, Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> wrote:
>> Andreas Kiermeier <andreas.kiermeier@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I don't think you need the ":noweb yes" as part of the setup_fu
>>> header, as this block is not pulling in other materials.
>>>
>>> Having used this type of setup only over the last couple of days, I've
>>> come up with another question. It appears that the setup_fu is
>>> executed twice ... once as it's own source block (though by itself not
>>> need) and once as part of the second noweb block. This isn't a problem
>>> if the execution time is small, but I'm trying to create a summary
>>> table in Latex format from 2 million records - so the time is
>>> considerable.
>>>
>>
>> Check out the :eval header argument: if you use
>>
>> ,----
>> | #+BEGIN_SRC R :eval never :exports none
>> `----
>>
>> this block is never executed - this should work. There are also other
>> values for :eval. From the help:
>>
>> ,----
>> | 14.8.2.25 `:eval'
>> | .................
>> |
>> | The `:eval' header argument can be used to limit the evaluation of
>> | specific code blocks.  The `:eval' header argument can be useful for
>> | protecting against the evaluation of dangerous code blocks or to ensure
>> | that evaluation will require a query regardless of the value of the
>> | `org-confirm-babel-evaluate' variable.  The possible values of `:eval'
>> | and their effects are shown below.
>> |
>> | `never or no'
>> |      The code block will not be evaluated under any circumstances.
>> |
>> | `query'
>> |      Evaluation of the code block will require a query.
>> |
>> | `never-export or no-export'
>> |      The code block will not be evaluated during export but may still
>> |      be called interactively.
>> |
>> | `query-export'
>> |      Evaluation of the code block during export will require a query.
>> |
>> |    If this header argument is not set then evaluation is determined by
>> | the value of the `org-confirm-babel-evaluate' variable see *Note Code
>> | evaluation security::.
>> `----
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Rainer
>>
>>
>>> My two blocks (with some code removed for simplicity) are as follow:
>>>
>>> #+NAME: tbl-refyear
>>> #+BEGIN_SRC R :results silent :exports none
>>>   latex(tabular( <code remove>  ))
>>> #+END_SRC
>>>
>>> #+BEGIN_SRC latex :noweb yes
>>> \begin{table}[h]
>>> \label{tbl:refyear}
>>> \caption{Separation outcomes (death or any type of discharge) by
>>> reference year.}
>>> <<tbl-refyear()>>
>>> \end{table}
>>> #+END_SRC
>>>
>>> I've tried :cache yes as part of the tbl-refyear source block, but
>>> that didn't stop if from being run twice. Am I missing a suitable
>>> header argument?
>>>
>>> This is the only way I could find to wrap the latex table (which has
>>> some complex formatting and hence why I've used it over just producing
>>> a table) in a float with a caption (though I still can't properly
>>> reference the label when I export to a PDF file).
>>>
>>> Any thought would be greatly appreciated. TIA!
>>>
>>> Andreas
>
>

-- 
Rainer M. Krug
email: Rainer<at>krugs<dot>de
PGP: 0x0F52F982

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 494 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-19 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-18 13:17 «Macro» expansion in source blocks; code-sharing between blocks Tobias Getzner
2014-09-18 13:26 ` Tobias Getzner
2014-09-18 14:01   ` Eric S Fraga
2014-09-18 14:40     ` Tobias Getzner
2014-09-18 23:44     ` Andreas Kiermeier
2014-09-19  2:59       ` Charles Berry
2014-09-19 10:18         ` Andreas Kiermeier
2014-09-19  7:44       ` Eric S Fraga
2014-09-19  9:04       ` Rainer M Krug
2014-09-19 10:19         ` Andreas Kiermeier
2014-09-19 10:59           ` Rainer M Krug [this message]
2014-09-20  6:57             ` header arguments, inheritance, and noweb expansion Was: " Andreas Kiermeier
2014-09-20 16:06               ` Charles Berry
2014-09-21  4:19                 ` Andreas Kiermeier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2tx43j2oj.fsf_-_@krugs.de \
    --to=rainer@krugs.de \
    --cc=andreas.kiermeier@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).