From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chunyang Xu <mail@xuchunyang.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-info: Fix docstring
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2016 05:44:18 +0800
Message-ID: <m2twa6uqx9.fsf@xuchunyang.me>
References: <m2mvfye5a5.fsf@xuchunyang.me> <m2vaumuxcs.fsf@xuchunyang.me>
	<87r35a6y4i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33599)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@xuchunyang.me>) id 1cHHLn-0005vv-FY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:44:36 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@xuchunyang.me>) id 1cHHLi-0000Kv-KV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:44:35 -0500
Received: from smtpbgau1.qq.com ([54.206.16.166]:39483)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@xuchunyang.me>) id 1cHHLi-0000I8-1n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:44:30 -0500
In-reply-to: <87r35a6y4i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Nicolas Goaziou writes:

> Hello,
>
> Chunyang Xu <mail@xuchunyang.me> writes:
>
>> Never mind. The first patch was incorrect. I have attached a new
>> patch.
>
> Thank you. Since that docstring was badly formatted, I applied your
> suggestion along with other changes.

No problem at all. Thank you for your work.

> Regards,