From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Rooke Subject: Re: Unable to clock in on task Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:53:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <3949.1256654208@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <2FA5AF81-C2CA-4318-AA04-FF734ACC5B76@acm.org> <4882.1256656002@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N2oMG-0007sP-WB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:53:17 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N2oMB-0007qj-Uj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:53:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34647 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N2oMB-0007qg-Ra for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:53:11 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.211.194]:65278) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N2oMB-0003AM-I0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:53:11 -0400 Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so249871ywh.14 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:53:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4882.1256656002@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:06:42 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: Org Mode List Nick Dokos writes: > Even better, using org-submit-bug-report would have shown us that the > "agenda file list in a file" convention was being used - as you can > imagine, that's not the setting I use, so when I tried clocking in > yesterday, things worked without a problem for me. Back in the days of v3.x/4.x when I originally wrote the org reference card I would pride myself on knowing pretty much everything the mode offered...nowadays, sadly, lots of bits pass me by. I didn't even know of the bug report function :( Still I do now, thanks and I will use it in future. > Moralizingly-but-I-hope-not-overbearingly-so yours, Not at all, it was a fair point. Regards, Phil